<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Coleção:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/2504" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/2504</id>
  <updated>2026-05-04T15:52:31Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-05-04T15:52:31Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>PI de cultivares na Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros : estudo das relações de parceria / Sayonara Marinho Soares Borges</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/3441" />
    <author>
      <name>Borges, Sayonara Marinho Soares</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/3441</id>
    <updated>2017-11-24T21:45:32Z</updated>
    <published>2014-07-24T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: PI de cultivares na Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros : estudo das relações de parceria / Sayonara Marinho Soares Borges
Autor(es): Borges, Sayonara Marinho Soares
Abstract: Considering the legal and technical sceneries, which are favorable to the development of new cultivars: the founding of the National System for Cultivar Protection in the Department of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply (SNPC/MAPA), the Cultivar Protection Act (LPC), the Biosafety Act (LB), the Industrial Property Act (LPI), the Innovation Act (LI), the Seeds and Seedlings Act (LSM) and also the vegetable Genetic Improvement Program (PMGV), as well as the farming sector and market demand for technological solutions, this work aims at studying the partnership affairs between Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation - Embrapa Coastal Tablelands and other Embrapa Units for the development of cultivars. As part of the methodology, the case study was divided into a quantitative and qualitative research, focusing mainly on looking into the number of registered cultivars as of the year in which the SNPC was founded until the latest cultivar jointly developed by Embrapa Coastal Tablelands and other Embrapa Units, presenting the scenario of cultivars placed on the market after the SNPC was founded and having a deeper look into the intellectual property (IP) status of those new materials. In order to complement the quantitative data, searches were carried out on the Embrapa Headquarters and Embrapa Products and Market´s websites, with the assistance of Embrapa´s Technological Business Secretariat. Moreover, interviews were conducted with Embrapa´s improvers and experienced cultivar IP technicians at Embrapa Products and Market in Petrolina/PE and Sete Lagoas/MG. The partnership affairs were matched up by means of bibliographic revision, based the concept of innovation management employed by leading organizations, called Open Innovation. The study has shown that Embrapa Coastal Tablelands had jointly developed 23 cultivars with other Embrapa Units. The hybrids were disregarded as part of the results, being counted in only to encompass the totals of cultivar development, as well as to update the Unit´s product catalogue. It has been concluded that the partnership among Units has made it possible to empower the initiatives for technology transfer by the partner Units in the region of the Coastal Tablelands, as well as to enhance vegetable genetic improvement programs and to introduce in the production systems materials which are more adaptable to the Brazilian Northeast soil and climate conditions.</summary>
    <dc:date>2014-07-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Um estudo sobre mapeamento de produtos do agronegócio com potencial para a proteção por Indicação Geográfica : o caso da laranja produzida no território sul sergipano</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/3440" />
    <author>
      <name>Santos, Adeilson Freire dos</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/3440</id>
    <updated>2017-11-24T21:40:06Z</updated>
    <published>2015-09-24T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: Um estudo sobre mapeamento de produtos do agronegócio com potencial para a proteção por Indicação Geográfica : o caso da laranja produzida no território sul sergipano
Autor(es): Santos, Adeilson Freire dos
Abstract: Geographical Indication (GI) has been considered a market strategic tool for commercial organizations worldwide, bringing differentiation of products and services in relation to competition, in a context of greater demand from consumers who are willing to acquire them for uniqueness, tradition and guarantee local production. The Brazilian Industrial Property Law establishes that the GI is classified into two modalities: Indication of Origin (IO) and Designation of Origin (DO). Several studies have been performed on GI in Brazil and around the world describing concepts, applications and case studies of GI, emphasizing the development and appreciation of regions after getting her record of producing areas by IO or DO. But when it comes to mapping potential future products for GI in sectors of great importance for the Brazilian economy, such as agribusiness, it is observed that there is a gap in this type of study in the state of Sergipe, even with the work of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply at the national level. Whereas orange produced in the South Territory of Sergipe is an important product in the state´s economy and it is representative on the national scene, this study aims to identify the potential that the orange produced in this region has to be protected by GI. This research is characterized as a qualitative exploratory case study. To achieve the goals and respond the research questions, data were collected through bibliographic research, documents and interviews with five (5) citrus industry experts of South Sergipe. These data were analyzed and classified into categories for content analysis. The study concludes and presents elements that suggest that South Orange Sergipe is a product with potential for GI because it has history and culture linked to the territory, it is known and marketed in the state and beyond, which can configure an IO, and it also has different taste qualities, because it is grown in a region with unique climate, soil and temperature, according to experts, which could set up a DO. This region of unique features extends to some of Bahia Northeastern cities. The study also shows a map with the planting areas with potential for demarcation of the GI. The implementation of a GI in South Sergipe can be a way for the resumption of growth and development of citrus production in the region by organizing producers to achieve registration at the INPI and improving business management. However, this can only occur if producers are united and committed to the GI and relying on the commitment of Federal, State and Municipal government and institutions connected with them such as MAPA, Embrapa, Emdagro, Sebrae and support of the University.</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-09-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Indicação geográfica como recurso estratégico : reputação e julgamento de marca do Porto Digital - Recife, PE</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/3442" />
    <author>
      <name>Fonsêca, Aurelio Ricardo Ribeiro</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/3442</id>
    <updated>2017-11-24T21:42:11Z</updated>
    <published>2015-07-20T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: Indicação geográfica como recurso estratégico : reputação e julgamento de marca do Porto Digital - Recife, PE
Autor(es): Fonsêca, Aurelio Ricardo Ribeiro
Abstract: Geographical Indications are signs used for goods that have a specific geographical origin and hold quality, reputation or characteristics that are essentially attributable to that origin.&#xD;
Geographical Indications and Trademarks are distinctive signs that allow producers to protect their established reputation against imitation or fraud. The use of Geographical Indication by&#xD;
regions that provide services has different goals of Geographical Indications by producing regions of tangible goods. Geographical Indication does not ensure legal exclusivity to the&#xD;
services offered by a technology park, or, more generally, by a Local Productive Arrangement. Thus, there is no clarity whether the derivatives strategic attributes of Geographical Indication - especially reputation - can generate competitive advantage. This&#xD;
study aims to check that the Geographical Indication gives competitive advantage and positive reputation to the local productive arrangement Porto Digital. Descriptive crosssectional&#xD;
study was conducted with 10 customers and 25 managers of companies belonging to the technological park Port Digital. A questionnaire was applied based on the customer-based&#xD;
brand equity model addressing the characterization of the companies and the values assigned by managers and customers to adherence, quality, superiority, consideration and credibility of&#xD;
Porto Digital Brand. Data and scores obtained were subjected to correlation analysis. Values above the mean score for Brand Judgment were obtained both by customers and by managers,&#xD;
and values above the mean score for Brand Adherence where obtained by managers. There was no significant correlation between billing, number of employees or age of companies and&#xD;
their assigned scores for Judgment and Adherence. Judgment and Adherence are correlated. Porto Digital brand gives positive brand judgment to the services offered by the technological&#xD;
park.</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-07-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Gestão da propriedade intelectual em empresas de base tecnológicas vinculadas à Incubadora Tecnológica de Campina Grande - PB</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/3439" />
    <author>
      <name>Silva, Rafaela</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/3439</id>
    <updated>2017-11-24T21:40:56Z</updated>
    <published>2014-09-28T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: Gestão da propriedade intelectual em empresas de base tecnológicas vinculadas à Incubadora Tecnológica de Campina Grande - PB
Autor(es): Silva, Rafaela
Abstract: Technological entrepreneurship is the combination of technology with the market to meet in advance to the wants and needs of customers by ensuring that adequate resources are allocated for the development and launch of products and services. The technology-based companies, in turn, have particularities in relation to traditional business sectors and therefore the importance of its dialogue with technology parks and business incubators. Such interaction is ideal because the entrepreneur of technology-based companies face an additional challenge, in relation to the others, to turn ideas into production, from researcher to entrepreneur. The Technological Park Foundation of Paraíba (PaqTcPB) through the Technology Incubator of Campina Grande (ITCG), 30 years ago, supports this type of company in the state of Paraíba, encouraging technology transfer , fostering the creation of new technology-based firms, approaching the world of Science, Technology and Innovation of the business world. It is important, also, the diffusion of the culture of protection and management of Intellectual Property (IP) for the consolidation of corporate strategies that exploit the intangible assets of such enterprise, turning assets into securable assets to company. In order to diagnose the IP management strategies used by companies related to ITCG, a questionnaire with objective and semi-structured open-ended questions, a set of companies in the database ITCG between incubated, graduates, associates was applied, or firms receiving a program to encourage the innovative entrepreneurship. Subjecting the data to a quantitative and qualitative analysis, traced the profile of these companies, 80% of them working in the TIC technology sector and up to six years of existence. Although 87% of companies having entrepreneurs with graduate degrees, masters in their majority, more than half of the group says its main product is not derived from the result of R&amp;D in universities. A total of 87% of companies consider their innovative product in the market, and 67% believe the product to be protectable, however, 87% of companies do not adopt any policy of acquisition, exploration and/or monitoring of IP assets. Of the respondents, only 33% have IP assets protected, but 60% have used a service provided by the INPI, with 20% of employee offices patent offices abroad. Just over half, 53%, claimed to have received some kind of training on ITCG PI, 73% consider it very important to protect IP assets and 47% find it very important to participate in the Incubator guidance on the topic to the company. Among the main difficulties listed in IP management are problems in defining what is protectable, the high cost of specialized services and bureaucracy and delay in analysis applications. As these companies are in the process of consolidation in negotiating world, it is crucial guidance and advice, permanently, by the ITCG to issues related to IP. Shares an educational basis, such as courses, lectures, or training to guide companies on how to identify their intangible assets, protect them and exploit them, are essential. However, stands as essential to providing a constant counseling, with specialized personnel to try to assist in resolving practical issues faced by the company, both in IP protection, as in the generation of resources from these assets.</summary>
    <dc:date>2014-09-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

