https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/11275 Wed, 28 Oct 2026 14:06:34 GMT 2026-10-28T14:06:34Z http://ri.ufs.br:80/retrieve/6c509cb1-bef5-4e3f-80ad-1ccacf4b96a1/PROFIAP.png https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/11275 https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/26202 Title: Artefatos concretos da cultura organizacional como instrumentos de (des)construção do racismo institucional: um estudo de caso no Tribunal Regional Eleitoral de Sergipe na gestão do biênio 2024-2026 Authors: Silva, Elielson Souza Abstract: Objective: to verify whether, within the Regional Electoral Court of Sergipe (TRE-SE), there are concrete artifacts (verbal, behavioral and physical) of the organizational culture that may express, reinforce and/or foster racial equity and the confrontation of institutional racism and, if so, how they present themselves, in light of documentary evidence and of the perceptions of senior management officials and of self-declared Black civil servants. Theoretical framework: the study is situated in the Public Policy research line of PROFIAP, to which it contributes by examining the conversion of the national racial equity policy of the Judiciary into institutional practice within the Regional Electoral Court of Sergipe, through the concrete artifacts of the organizational culture. Methodology: qualitative and exploratory research, conducted as an embedded single-case study with two units of analysis. Fourteen semi-structured interviews were carried out and submitted to categorical content analysis following the steps proposed by Sampaio and Lycarião (2021), triangulated with documentary and normative research and with participant observation records. Results: of the 373 thematic units delimited, 372 were coded into the seven artifact categories, and none of them revealed a racially affirmative artifact endowed with institutional stability. A specular reading was identified between the two poles and, within the management pole, a gradient of racial literacy. Triangulation showed that the asymmetry is concentrated in the regime of discretionary appointment to commissioned positions and functions, the only space of functional mobility that no internal rule subjects to a racial equity criterion, even though Article 3 of CNJ Resolution No. 203/2015 expressly allows it. Originality and relevance: the originality lies in mobilizing the model of concrete artifacts as a lens for the racial reading of a public organization, which makes it possible to locate institutional racism in observable manifestations rather than in intentions. The relevance stems from the agenda established by the National Pact of the Judiciary for Racial Equity and from the fact that the study identifies, with precision, the point at which available regulation ceases to be converted into practice. Practical contributions (impact): the impacts are potential, since the product constitutes a proposal not yet implemented, and lie in the organizational, management and public policy areas. As a technical-technological product, a draft resolution is proposed establishing racial equity guidelines at TRE-SE, systematized from the 112 propositional constructions formulated by the participants themselves and ranked so that structural measures lead those of a symbolic and formative nature. Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/26202 2026-08-28T00:00:00Z https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/26192 Title: Lean Healthcare: proposta de melhoria contínua para os processos logísticos da gestão de medicamentos em um hospital universitário Authors: Silveira, Maria Grazielle Santana Abstract: Objective: This study aims to propose an intervention model for the continuous improvement of logistics processes regarding medication management in a university hospital, grounded in Lean principles and operationalized through Lean tools. The research addresses the growing interest in the literature regarding the adaptation of the Lean philosophy—originally developed for industrial production—to the hospital context, aiming to reduce waste, costs, and inefficiencies while focusing on creating value for the patient. Theoretical Framework: Situated within the Public Administration and Organizations research line, the study is grounded in three pillars: hospital medication logistics and supply chain management; public procurement; and Lean Thinking applied to healthcare (Lean Healthcare). Methodology: This is an applied, qualitative, and exploratory study conducted under an interpretivist paradigm and an inductive approach. It employs a case study method, with data collection carried out through document analysis. Main Results: Six bottlenecks or forms of waste were identified: complex logistics flow, process variability, high inventory levels, operational errors, underutilization of indicators, and limited organizational learning. Based on these findings, an intervention model supported by Lean tools was structured and subsequently materialized into a Continuous Improvement Guide for hospital medication management. Originality and Relevance: The originality lies in proposing an intervention model structured for the context of public university hospitals, integrating Lean principles and tools into a systematized approach for the continuous improvement of medication logistics. Its relevance is demonstrated by the pursuit of sustainable solutions for chronic challenges in hospital management. Practical Contributions: The proposed model is expected to assist managers in identifying waste, standardizing processes, rationalizing inventory, enhancing logistics management, strengthening evidence-based decision-making, and increasing efficiency in public hospital administration. Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/26192 2026-08-28T00:00:00Z https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/26129 Title: O feedback que transforma: monitoramento ativo da Auditoria Interna em uma Instituição Federal de Ensino Authors: Amaral, Giulliano Santana Silva do Abstract: The objective of this research is to propose a systematic methodology for the continuous monitoring of Internal Audit recommendations, consolidated in a Good Practices Manual, with a view to contributing to the improvement of public management at the Federal Institute of Sergipe (IFS). The theoretical framework of the study is situated within the Public Administration and Organizations research line of the Professional Graduate Program in Public Administration (PROFIAP) at the Federal University of Sergipe (UFS) and is grounded in the strategic role of Government Internal Audit in strengthening governance, risk management, internal controls, and accountability. The study contributes to this research line by discussing managerial practices and instruments aimed at improving organizational processes and adding value to public management. The methodology adopts a qualitative, applied, and descriptive approach through a single embedded case study conducted at IFS. Documentary analysis, semi structured interviews, and participant observation are used as sources of evidence, which are examined through content analysis and triangulation, with the SWOT Matrix also employed as a diagnostic tool. The results show that the monitoring of recommendations is institutionalized at IFS but still faces operational limitations; that the lack of standardization compromises the uniformity of the monitoring process; that communication between Internal Audit and managers contributes to its effectiveness; and that monitoring strengthens governance and contributes to the continuous improvement of public management. The study also identifies needs related to the standardization of procedures, information integration, technological support, and the systematization of monitoring activities. The originality of the study lies in the development of a systematic methodology grounded in the empirical diagnosis of a Federal Educational Institution, integrating, within a single proposal, procedures, responsibilities, managerial instruments, communication mechanisms, transparency, and technological support for the continuous monitoring of recommendations. The relevance of the study lies in addressing an essential stage of the Government Internal Audit cycle and responding to needs identified in the institutional context under investigation, helping to bridge normative frameworks and monitoring practices while providing proposals that can be adapted to other Federal Educational Institutions. As practical contributions (impact), the research develops a Technical-Technological Product (TTP), as an applied research output, materialized in a Good Practices Manual for the continuous monitoring of Internal Audit recommendations in Federal Educational Institutions, comprising guidelines, procedures, instruments, and indicators designed to support auditors and managers. The development of the product constitutes an actual research output, whereas the effects arising from its implementation represent potential impacts in the organizational and practical dimensions, by fostering standardization, traceability, communication, and the monitoring of recommendations, as well as in the societal and public policy dimensions, by potentially supporting transparency, accountability, governance, and public value creation. Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/26129 2026-08-25T00:00:00Z https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/26017 Title: IEGM e Agenda 2030: a dimensão i-Saúde e evidências institucionais para o planejamento municipal em saúde nos municípios sergipanos Authors: Resende, Vanessa Reis Seixas Abstract: Objective: To analyze how the items and results of the i-Saúde dimension of the Municipal Management Effectiveness Index (IEGM), articulated with the Sustainable Cities Development Index, Brazil (IDSC-BR), and the Municipal Health Plans (MHPs), can constitute institutional evidence useful for municipal health planning aligned with the targets of Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG 3) in the municipalities of Sergipe, from the perspective of public governance. Methodology: The research adopted a predominantly qualitative approach, complemented by descriptive quantitative treatment, and was designed as a single-case study with multiple units of analysis. Three sources of institutional evidence were articulated: IEGM/i-Saúde data and microdata for the 2017 to 2024 period; IDSC-BR indicators related to SDG 3 from the 2023 and 2024 editions; and five MHPs intentionally selected based on classification persistence, inclusion of the four typological profiles, territorial and demographic diversity, and documentary suitability. The MHPs were subjected to qualitative descriptive documentary analysis, guided by a protocol comprising five interpretive dimensions. Main Results: The i-Saúde dimension showed a predominance of intermediate classifications and, in 2024, a redistribution toward category B, with a reduction in the number of municipalities classified in category C. This result was interpreted cautiously in view of the methodological changes made to the instrument. The typological articulation between i-Saúde and IDSC-BR identified four relative profiles, defined according to state medians, and 23 municipalities with persistent classifications across the two analytical pairings. The analysis of the MHPs revealed an incipient incorporation of the 2030 Agenda, variations in the coherence among diagnoses, priorities, objectives, targets, indicators, and monitoring mechanisms, as well as the absence of an automatic correspondence between the documentary quality of the plans and the municipalities’ relative positions in the instruments. Vocabulary convergent with the 2030 Agenda was also identified, although without explicit textual linkage to this framework. Theoretical and Methodological Contributions: The research broadens the understanding of public governance informed by institutional evidence by articulating external oversight, monitoring of the 2030 Agenda, and sectoral health planning. Methodologically, it systematizes a typological procedure that can be replicated and adapted to other contexts, as well as a fivedimension analytical protocol for the documentary examination of MHPs. Relevance and Originality: The relevance of the study derives from the integration of instruments with distinct characteristics and purposes to support municipal health planning. Its originality lies in applying, to the health field in Sergipe, an articulation inspired by a precedent developed in the educational field and in proposing four relative profiles constructed from state medians. Social and Management Contributions: The research provides municipal managers, Municipal Health Councils, and the Sergipe State Court of Accounts (TCE/SE) with evidence and operational instruments, materialized in a Final Technical Report and a Practical Guide, to support the preparation and revision of MHPs, the incorporation of the 2030 Agenda and SDG 3, the measurability of targets, documentary traceability, and budgetary articulation. By fostering more coherent, transparent, and evidence-informed plans, the research has the potential to contribute to greater responsiveness and equity in municipal health planning. Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/26017 2026-08-31T00:00:00Z