<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Coleção:</title>
    <link>https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/2464</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 03:33:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-09-22T03:33:59Z</dc:date>
    
    <item>
      <title>Efeito da prática deliberada em ciclos rápidos na performance técnica da equipe multiprofissional no manejo da ventilação mecânica</title>
      <link>https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/26145</link>
      <description>Título: Efeito da prática deliberada em ciclos rápidos na performance técnica da equipe multiprofissional no manejo da ventilação mecânica
Autor(es): Passos, Meiriane do Carmo
Abstract: Introduction: Mechanical ventilation is widely used in the care of critically ill patients; &#xD;
however, it is associated with preventable complications such as Ventilator-Associated &#xD;
Pneumonia (VAP). Adherence to preventive measures depends on the technical performance &#xD;
of the multidisciplinary team, which is still characterized by variability in clinical practice. In &#xD;
this context, Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice (RCDP) has emerged as an educational strategy &#xD;
based on structured task repetition and immediate feedback. Objective: To analyze the effect &#xD;
of simulation-based training using Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice on the knowledge and &#xD;
technical performance of a multidisciplinary team in the management of mechanically &#xD;
ventilated patients. Methods: A multimethod study composed of a scoping review and a quasi&#xD;
experimental before-and-after study with repeated measures. The scoping review followed the &#xD;
Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, with searches conducted in PubMed, &#xD;
Scopus, ScienceDirect, ERIC, and the Virtual Health Library databases. The quasi&#xD;
experimental study was carried out with healthcare professionals from adult Intensive Care &#xD;
Units. The intervention consisted of simulation-based training structured according to RCDP &#xD;
principles, including immediate interruption upon errors, instructional feedback, and task &#xD;
repetition until proficiency was achieved. Theoretical knowledge, technical performance, and &#xD;
participants’ perceptions of the methodology were assessed. Data were analyzed using &#xD;
descriptive and inferential statistics, with a significance level of 5%. Results: The scoping &#xD;
review included 31 studies and demonstrated positive effects of RCDP on technical and non&#xD;
technical skills, self-confidence, and performance of procedures in critical situations. However, &#xD;
gaps remain regarding skill retention, transfer to clinical practice, and impact on patient &#xD;
outcomes. In the quasi-experimental study (n=124), a significant increase in knowledge scores &#xD;
was observed after the intervention (7.60±1.64 vs. 8.14±1.42; p&lt;0.001). Technical performance &#xD;
showed a high overall proficiency level (89.5±5.3), with 90.8% of participants achieving the &#xD;
predefined proficiency criterion. The highest proficiency rates were observed in the domains &#xD;
related to artificial airway management, sedation management, and ventilator weaning. &#xD;
Regarding participants’ perceptions, most strongly agreed that RCDP contributed to the &#xD;
development of skills required for mechanical ventilation management (87.9%), improved &#xD;
technical performance through rapid practice-feedback cycles (87.1%), and increased &#xD;
confidence in applying procedures in clinical practice (91.1%). At the 30-day follow-up (n=13), &#xD;
partial retention of knowledge gains was observed, with lower scores compared to the &#xD;
immediate post-test, although the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.080). &#xD;
Conclusion: RCDP demonstrated potential to improve knowledge, promote high levels of &#xD;
proficiency in the implementation of VAP prevention measures, and strengthen the self&#xD;
confidence of multidisciplinary healthcare professionals in the management of mechanically &#xD;
ventilated patients. These findings support the applicability of RCDP as a continuing education &#xD;
strategy in intensive care and its potential to enhance standardization of clinical practices and &#xD;
patient safety. Nevertheless, limitations related to the short follow-up period and the absence of &#xD;
clinical outcome assessment warrant cautious interpretation of the results.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/26145</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-06-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fatores associados à catastrofização da dor aguda pós-cesária e seus impactos na recuperação funcional de puérperas em pós-operatório mediato: um estudo transversal</title>
      <link>https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/26127</link>
      <description>Título: Fatores associados à catastrofização da dor aguda pós-cesária e seus impactos na recuperação funcional de puérperas em pós-operatório mediato: um estudo transversal
Autor(es): Pereira, Milena Santos
Abstract: Introduction: Cesarean section is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures among women of reproductive age, and acute postoperative pain is one of its most frequent complications. Acute post-cesarean pain represents a major challenge to postpartum recovery. Pain catastrophizing, characterized by a negative cognitive and emotional response to actual or anticipated pain, has been associated with greater pain intensity and impaired functional recovery. Objective: To evaluate the factors associated with acute post-cesarean pain catastrophizing and its impact on the functional recovery of women during the early postoperative postpartum period. Method: This was a cross-sectional analytical study conducted in a low-risk maternity hospital in the interior of Sergipe, Northeastern Brazil. Puerperal women in the intermediate postoperative period (≥24 h) after cesarean section were included. The primary outcome was pain catastrophizing, assessed using the 13-item Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), which measures catastrophic thinking related to pain using a 5- point Likert scale. Independent variables included pain characteristics, sociodemographic, clinical, obstetric, and perioperative factors. Descriptive statistics were presented as absolute and relative frequencies. Bivariate associations were tested using Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, with Cramér’s V estimation. Correlations between catastrophizing and functional outcomes were assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient with bootstrap resampling (1,000 samples) and BCa 95% confidence intervals. The overall impact of catastrophizing on functionality was analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA), adjusted for pain intensity. Multivariate significance was evaluated using Pillai’s trace. Following a significant global effect, ANCOVAs were performed for each functional outcome, with bootstrap adjustment and Bonferroni correction. Results were expressed as estimated marginal means and effect sizes (partial eta squared, η²p), adopting a 5% significance level. Results: The sample comprised 232 puerperal women experiencing pain in the intermediate postoperative period following cesarean section, with a predominance of moderate to severe pain at the time of interview (52.6%). Most participants were younger than 35 years (79.3%), self-identified as non-White (88.8%), were users of the public health system (78.4%), unemployed (79.7%), recipients of governmental financial assistance (59.9%), and lived in owned housing (68.1%) in urban areas (56.9%). Educational level was predominantly ≥12 years of schooling (59.1%). Pain catastrophizing was correlated with functional impairments. Multivariate analysis (MANCOVA) demonstrated a significant effect of catastrophizing on functional outcomes (Pillai’s trace = 0.49; F(34,426) = 4.110; p &lt; 0.001; ηp2 = 0.247). In the univariate analyses adjusted for pain intensity (ANCOVA), catastrophizing significantly impacted 15 of the 17 functional outcomes assessed (p &lt; 0.05). Post hoc multiple comparisons showed that women with low levels of catastrophizing had significantly better functionality than those with high/very high levels across most outcomes, with pronounced mean differences in general activity (Mdiff = −3.36; p &lt; 0.001), mood (Mdiff = −3.59; p &lt; 0.001), and breastfeeding (Mdiff = −3.20; p = 0.002). Significant differences were also observed between the low and moderate catastrophizing groups, particularly regarding ambulation (p &lt; 0.001) and newborn care activities, such as bathing (p = 0.010) and holding the infant (p = 0.013). Conclusion:Pain catastrophizing was associated with pain and functionality in the postoperative period following cesarean section. Associations were observed with gynecological-obstetric characteristics, childbirth care, and pain-related factors. A previous history of postpartum depression and labor induction increased the likelihood of elevated levels of this construct, independently of age and pain intensity. Catastrophizing significantly impacted functional outcomes, with greater impairments among women with higher levels of catastrophizing.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/26127</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-07-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Construção e validação de um instrumento de transição de cuidados neonatal para recém-nascido pré-termo</title>
      <link>https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/25808</link>
      <description>Título: Construção e validação de um instrumento de transição de cuidados neonatal para recém-nascido pré-termo
Autor(es): Santos, José Matheus de Melo
Abstract: Preterm newborns from intensive care units undergo several services after discharge, going to &#xD;
follow-up clinics and primary care. This transition is a crucial time where health information &#xD;
must be passed on securely. Therefore, the development of a standardized transition form that &#xD;
guarantees this transition becomes a viable strategy to promote the continuity of care effectively &#xD;
and safely. The objective of this research was to develop a neonatal care transition form to &#xD;
standardize the transition of information between the units responsible for the care of preterm &#xD;
infants. Therefore, a methodological research was carried out in three stages, respectively: the &#xD;
survey of the theoretical-methodological framework, the semantic analysis of the proposed &#xD;
form, and the content validation of the version of the transition of care form. The sample was &#xD;
non-probabilistic, meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The construction of the form &#xD;
was carried out based on the Instrument Construction Model. The Delphi method was used to &#xD;
validate the form. Data obtained from Google Forms were transferred to Microsoft Excel and &#xD;
analyzed in version 4.1.0 of the R software. Data were subjected to statistical analysis using the &#xD;
Content Validation Index (CVI), the binomial test, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and Kendall's &#xD;
coefficient of agreement. Content validation was considered when the CVI≥ 0.80. All domains &#xD;
were approved after one round of semantic analysis and two rounds of content validation. This &#xD;
study enabled the construction and validation of a care transition form that will enable the &#xD;
transmission of information between units in a standardized way and with greater data security.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/25808</guid>
      <dc:date>2022-07-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Efeito de uma tecnologia educativa na interação mãe-filho durante a amamentação avaliada pela escala interativa de amamentação: ensaio clínico randomizado</title>
      <link>https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/25574</link>
      <description>Título: Efeito de uma tecnologia educativa na interação mãe-filho durante a amamentação avaliada pela escala interativa de amamentação: ensaio clínico randomizado
Autor(es): Santos, Andrêina Cristina Nascimento dos
Abstract: Introduction: Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is essential for the health of the mother–infant&#xD;
dyad; however, its prevalence remains below national and global recommendations. In this&#xD;
context, educational technologies have emerged as promising strategies to promote&#xD;
breastfeeding and strengthen mother–infant interaction during the breastfeeding process.&#xD;
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of an educational technology on the&#xD;
dynamic interaction between mother and child during exclusive breastfeeding. Methodology:&#xD;
This was a randomized controlled clinical trial with a quantitative approach, single-blind,&#xD;
conducted in Primary Health Care units in the municipalities of Itabaiana and Lagarto,&#xD;
Sergipe, Brazil. Pregnant women aged ≥18 years receiving prenatal care were randomly&#xD;
allocated into control and intervention groups. The intervention consisted of an educational&#xD;
serial album combined with postpartum follow-up. Mother–infant interaction was assessed&#xD;
using the Interactive Breastfeeding Scale at five time points: during pregnancy and at 7, 30,&#xD;
90, and 180 days postpartum. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics,&#xD;
including linear mixed-effects models, with a significance level of 5%. A total of 106&#xD;
pregnant women were recruited, with a final sample of 53 participants. Results: The results&#xD;
demonstrated a stable trajectory of interaction scores over time, with no statistically&#xD;
significant differences between the groups. However, obstetric and sociodemographic&#xD;
variables were associated with interaction scores, particularly pregnancy planning, as mothers&#xD;
with unplanned pregnancies showed higher interaction scores in the immediate postpartum&#xD;
period. Conclusion: It is concluded that the educational technology did not produce&#xD;
significant differences in mother–infant interaction between groups; however, individual&#xD;
factors influenced this process, highlighting the need for personalized approaches in maternal&#xD;
and child care. This study contributes to advancing knowledge by integrating educational&#xD;
technology and systematic assessment of mother–infant interaction in the context of&#xD;
breastfeeding.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/25574</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-06-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

