<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Coleção:</title>
    <link>https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/2491</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 23:07:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-09-30T23:07:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Guidelines for adopting micro frontends</title>
      <link>https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/26172</link>
      <description>Título: Guidelines for adopting micro frontends
Autor(es): Santos, Luiz Felipe Cirqueira dos
Abstract: Context: The size and structure of software development teams directly impact the design&#xD;
and construction of systems. According to Conway’s Law, the internal organization of&#xD;
teams influences the architecture of the systems developed, reflecting their communication&#xD;
flows. In the context of frontend architectures, approaches such as monolithic frontends,&#xD;
microservices, and microfrontends present different trade-offs in terms of performance,&#xD;
modularity, and scalability. While smaller teams tend to benefit from monolithic&#xD;
architectures due to their simplicity and agility, larger and distributed teams may adopt&#xD;
microfrontends to promote greater autonomy, scalability, and organizational alignment. This&#xD;
alignment between organizational structure and architecture is essential to ensure systems&#xD;
that are technically viable and aligned with the operational reality of teams. Problem: The&#xD;
integration between backend and frontend in microservices-based architectures is complex&#xD;
and requires solutions that balance modularity, specialization, and governance without&#xD;
compromising team cohesion. There is a lack of consolidated guidelines to support the&#xD;
adoption of microfrontends, both in the literature and in industrial practice. Objective:&#xD;
To propose a set of guidelines for the adoption of microfrontends in microservices-based&#xD;
environments, aiming to reduce risks, maximize benefits, and align architectural decisions&#xD;
with organizational structure. Method: The research was conducted based on the Design&#xD;
Science Research (DSR) methodology, focusing on the development and validation of&#xD;
an artifact. The following steps were carried out: (i) Systematic Literature Mapping, to&#xD;
characterize the state of the art; (ii) Multivocal Systematic Review, integrating academic&#xD;
and industrial evidence; (iii) Survey with industry professionals, to understand the state&#xD;
of practice; and (iv) empirical studies, including a controlled experiment and a case&#xD;
study, to evaluate performance and analyze the applicability of the proposed guidelines.&#xD;
Results: The results indicate that microfrontends are more suitable for organizations&#xD;
with higher maturity in DevOps practices, distributed teams, and systems with multiple&#xD;
business domains. Architectures based on monolithic applications were observed to provide&#xD;
better initial performance, whereas microfrontend-based architectures offer modularization&#xD;
mechanisms that may support both technical and organizational scalability, as evidenced&#xD;
by the literature and industry reports. The proposed guidelines encompass aspects of&#xD;
architecture, governance, integration, quality assurance, and team organization, and are&#xD;
grounded in evidence derived from the literature, industry practice, and experimental studies&#xD;
conducted in a controlled environment. Conclusion: The adoption of microfrontends&#xD;
should be context-driven and aligned with the organizational structure, as advocated by&#xD;
Conway’s Law. The proposed guidelines provide a structured set of recommendations&#xD;
grounded in academic, industrial, and experimental evidence, supporting architectural&#xD;
decision-making across different organizational contexts. The results obtained provide&#xD;
evidence regarding the technical aspects of the architecture and indicate the need for&#xD;
further studies in real-world environments to evaluate organizational and operational&#xD;
factors associated with microfrontend adoption.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/26172</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-07-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Geração de dados totalmente sintéticos para alta segura neonatal: uma metodologia orientada por conhecimento baseada em redes bayesianas</title>
      <link>https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/26169</link>
      <description>Título: Geração de dados totalmente sintéticos para alta segura neonatal: uma metodologia orientada por conhecimento baseada em redes bayesianas
Autor(es): Santos, Jean Louis Silva
Abstract: Context: Neonatal hospital discharge is a critical stage in the transition of care, requiring&#xD;
multidimensional assessment of biophysiological, preventive, and healthcare-related conditions.&#xD;
Problem: Although Artificial Intelligence-based Clinical Decision Support Systems have the&#xD;
potential to reduce variability in professional judgment, their development in neonatology is&#xD;
limited by the scarcity of labeled records, legal restrictions on the use of sensitive health data,&#xD;
and the cold start problem. Motivation: The generation of fully synthetic data emerges as&#xD;
an alternative to support research, simulation, and computational development without direct&#xD;
exposure of real medical records. Justification: In sensitive domains such as neonatology,&#xD;
synthetic approaches guided only by data may depend on prior real datasets, reproduce biases,&#xD;
or generate clinically implausible combinations, making a knowledge-driven, interpretable, and&#xD;
auditable strategy relevant. Methodology: This dissertation proposes and evaluates a Bayesian&#xD;
Network-based methodology for generating fully synthetic data applied to decision support in safe&#xD;
neonatal discharge, without using real medical records in the modeling process. The methodology&#xD;
was developed incrementally, starting from an initial model with 11 clinical variables (Core11)&#xD;
and advancing to an expanded version with 18 variables (Core18). The causal network topology,&#xD;
Conditional Probability Tables (CPTs), normative weights, and clinical audit rules were defined&#xD;
based on specialized literature, normative documents, and clinical knowledge curation. The&#xD;
evaluation used internal validation protocols, including statistical fidelity, conditional inference,&#xD;
predictive utility under a Train on Synthetic, Test on Synthetic (TSTS) regime, SHAP-based&#xD;
explainability, threshold analysis, borderline case auditing, multivariate topological fidelity, and&#xD;
clinical edit checks. Results: The main experiments were conducted with 10,000 synthetic&#xD;
records in each model version. In Core11, the results indicated approval in protocols S1 and&#xD;
S2, a mean Kappa of 0.9445 in protocol S3, Hellinger Distance approved in 11/11 variables,&#xD;
and PCD-MAD of 0.0088 in protocol S7. In Core18, the expansion maintained good statistical,&#xD;
topological, and inferential fidelity, with S1 approved in 7/7 tests, S2 approved in 14/14 cases, a&#xD;
mean Kappa of 0.9209, Hellinger Distance approved in 18/18 variables, and PCD-MAD of 0.0097.&#xD;
However, relevant limitations were also observed, including divergence between explanatory&#xD;
importance and normative weights in S3SHAP, instability of decision thresholds in protocols S4&#xD;
and S5, and the occurrence of clinical edit check violations in 36.9% of the synthetic records.&#xD;
Conclusions: It is concluded that the proposed approach is promising as a privacy-by-design&#xD;
synthetic data generation methodology for neonatal cold start scenarios, especially because it&#xD;
preserves probabilistic and topological properties of the model without relying on real patient&#xD;
data. At the same time, the findings show that global statistical coherence alone does not guarantee&#xD;
full individual clinical plausibility. Thus, the main contribution of this dissertation lies not only&#xD;
in generating synthetic neonatal data, but also in formulating an auditable pipeline for modeling,&#xD;
validation, and identification of methodological limits, indicating the need for future mechanisms&#xD;
of calibration, clinical filtering, conditional resampling, and expert validation.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/26169</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-07-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Investigação de métodos para estimação de pesos de relevância para agrupamento de dados relacionais com múltiplas visões</title>
      <link>https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/25815</link>
      <description>Título: Investigação de métodos para estimação de pesos de relevância para agrupamento de dados relacionais com múltiplas visões
Autor(es): Silva, Vitória Teles da
Abstract: Multiview data clustering is characterized as the challenge of grouping similar data and separating&#xD;
dissimilar data by using different representations, such as attribute vectors, feature matrices,&#xD;
graphs, or images, whichtogetherprovidecomplementaryinformation.Thisapproachisappliedin&#xD;
real-world scenarios such as social network analysis, medical image classification, recommender&#xD;
systems, and multimedia data integration. Data clustering is one of the most relevant tools for&#xD;
data analysis, and its importance is related to the faithful representation of real-world data, with&#xD;
the combined use of multiple views providing greater accuracy when compared to the use of&#xD;
a single view. The experiments show that the performance of multiview clustering algorithms&#xD;
strongly depends on the distance metrics and weight estimation strategies. While MRDCA-RWL&#xD;
is more sensitive to the adopted distance metric, methods such as MVKKM and MVSC exhibit&#xD;
a strong joint dependence on both distance metrics and weights, reinforcing the importance of&#xD;
selecting appropriate parameters. Given the above, this work addresses the need for a proper&#xD;
interpretation of the use of multiview data in the context of contemporary applications, aiming to&#xD;
investigate different methods for estimating relevance weights. These weights are then applied to&#xD;
the different views in the context of relational data clustering, discussing both the quality of the&#xD;
results and the algorithmic efficiency in comparison with the complexity of competing solutions.&#xD;
Based on this, the experimental results demonstrate the influence of the methodological choices&#xD;
on the behavior of the algorithms, with MRDCA-RWL exhibiting more stable behavior, whereas&#xD;
MVKKM,MVSC,andTW-KMdemonstrate sensitivity to configuration changes.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/25815</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-07-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A comparative survey of ARM and RISC-V: architectures, applications and challenges</title>
      <link>https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/25810</link>
      <description>Título: A comparative survey of ARM and RISC-V: architectures, applications and challenges
Autor(es): Meira, Andre Reges Souza
Abstract: The selection of a processor instruction set architecture (ISA) has become a foundational&#xD;
engineering decision that shapes the performance, power efficiency, security, and supply-chain&#xD;
independence of modern computing systems. Three converging trends make a renewed comparison&#xD;
of ARM and RISC-V especially timely: the expansion of computing into safety- and securitycritical domains governed by standards such as ISO 26262 and IEC 61508; the rise of RISC-V as&#xD;
the first credible open alternative to ARM, with over ten billion cores shipped by 2024; and the&#xD;
growing demand for hardware auditability following microarchitectural attacks such as Spectre&#xD;
and Meltdown and supply-chain compromises such as the XZ Utils backdoor.&#xD;
In this master’s thesis, we provide a comprehensive, parallel-structured comparative survey of&#xD;
the ARM and RISC-V architectures, spanning ISA design and evolution, microarchitecture,&#xD;
vector processing, and virtualization, together with the application domains of robotics, artificial&#xD;
intelligence, and hardware security — dimensions that existing ISA-level, benchmarking, and&#xD;
industry analyses address only in isolation.&#xD;
The work is an architectural survey rather than an experimental benchmarking study, grounded in&#xD;
ISA specifications, peer-reviewed literature from IEEE, ACM, USENIX, and Springer venues,&#xD;
vendor datasheets and safety documentation, and international functional-safety standards, and&#xD;
organised as a chapter-by-chapter parallel evaluation of the two architectures.&#xD;
The analysis finds that the gap between ARM and RISC-V is increasingly one of ecosystem&#xD;
maturity rather than architectural capability: ARM offers a vertically integrated, broadly deployed&#xD;
ecosystem with hardware-enforced security defaults (PAC, MTE, BTI, CCA) and certified safety&#xD;
cores, whereas RISC-V offers openness, amenability to formal verification, and license-free&#xD;
customisation, with ISO 26262 ASIL D cores now emerging. For artificial-intelligence workloads,&#xD;
RISC-V demonstrates up to fourfold superior energy efficiency through custom extensions, while&#xD;
ARM delivers up to fifteenfold faster inference on complex networks through a mature toolchain;&#xD;
these figures are best-case, implementation-dependent trends rather than fixed architectural&#xD;
verdicts. Across robotics and security, architecture selection proves application- and certificationdependent rather than absolute, and the frontier is shifting from a binary ARM-versus-RISC-V&#xD;
choice toward heterogeneous designs that compose both architectures with domain-specific&#xD;
accelerators on a single platform.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/25810</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-07-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

