Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/24089
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorRezende, Rejane Lenier Santos-
dc.contributor.authorBonjardim, Leonardo Rigoldi-
dc.contributor.authorNeves, Eduardo Luis de Aquino-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Lidiane Carine Lima-
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Paula Santos-
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Cynthia Coelho de-
dc.contributor.authorAraujo, Adriano Antunes de Souza-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-17T19:12:06Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-17T19:12:06Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationREZENDE, R. L. S. et al. Oral health, temporomandibular disorder, and masticatory performance in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 2. The Scientific World Journal, New York, n. 1, 2013. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2013/425651. Acesso em: 17 dez. 2025.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1537-744X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/24089-
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherHindawi Publishing Corporationpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofThe Scientific World Journalpt_BR
dc.subjectOral healtheng
dc.subjectTemporomandibular disordereng
dc.subjectBruxismeng
dc.subjectCharcot-Marie-Tooth type 2eng
dc.titleOral health, temporomandibular disorder, and masticatory performance in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 2pt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.identifier.licenseCreative Commons Atribuição 3.0 Não Adaptada (CC BY 3.0)pt_BR
dc.description.resumoBackground. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oral health status of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and bruxism,as well as to measure masticatory performance of subjects with Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 2 (CMT2). Methods and Results. Theaverage number of decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) for both groups, control (CG) and CMT2, was considered low (CG= 2.46; CMT2 = 1.85, P = 0.227). The OHIP-14 score was considered low (CG = 2.86, CMT2 = 5.83, P = 0.899). The prevalenceof self-reported TMD was 33.3% and 38.9% (p = 0.718) in CG and CMT2 respectively and for self-reported bruxism was 4.8%(CG) and 22.2% (CMT2), without significant difference between groups (p = 0.162). The most common clinical sign of TMD wasmasseter (CG = 38.1%; CMT2 = 66.7%) and temporalis (CG = 19.0%; GCMT2 = 33.3%) muscle pain. The geometric mean diameter(GMD) was not significantly different between groups (CG = 4369; CMT2 = 4627, P = 0.157). Conclusion. We conclude that theCMT2 disease did not negatively have influence either on oral health status in the presence and severity of TMD and bruxism oron masticatory performancept_BR
dc.description.localNew Yorkpt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DFS - Artigos de periódicos
PPGCS - Artigos de periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
OralHealthTemporomandibularDisorderMasticatoryPerformance.pdf223,39 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.