Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/24566
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorRoriz, Anna Karla Carneiro-
dc.contributor.authorPassos, Luiz Carlos Santana-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Carolina Cunha de-
dc.contributor.authorEickemberg, Michaela-
dc.contributor.authorMoreira, Pricilla de Almeida-
dc.contributor.authorSampaio, Lílian Ramos-
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-10T19:51:45Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-10T19:51:45Z-
dc.date.issued2014-07-
dc.identifier.citationRORIZ, A. K. C. et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of anthropometric clinical indicators of visceral fat in adults and elderly. PloS one, San Francisco, v. 9, n. 7, e103499, jul. 2014. Disponível em: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0103499. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2026.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/24566-
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherPublic Library of Sciencept_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPloS Onept_BR
dc.subjectAnthropometric clinical indicatorseng
dc.subjectComputed tomographyeng
dc.subjectVisceral obesityeng
dc.subjectCross-sectional studyeng
dc.titleEvaluation of the accuracy of anthropometric clinical indicators of visceral fat in adults and elderlypt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.identifier.licenseCreative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0)pt_BR
dc.description.resumoBackground: Visceral obesity is associated with higher occurrence of cardiovascular events. There are few studies about the accuracy of anthropometric clinical indicators, using Computed Tomography (CT) as the gold standard. We aimed to determine the accuracy of anthropometric clinical indicators for discrimination of visceral obesity. Methods: Cross-sectional study with 191 adults and elderly of both sexes. Variables: area of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) identified by CT, Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR), Conicity index (C index), Lipid Accumulation Product (LAP) and Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI). ROC analyzes. Results: There were a strong correlation between adiposity indicators and VAT area. Higher accuracy of C index and WHtR (AUC$0.81) than the LAP and the VAI was observed. The higher AUC of LAP and VAI were observed among elderly with areas of 0.88 (CI: 0.766–0.944) and 0.83 (CI: 0.705–0.955) in men and 0.80 (CI: 0.672–0.930) and 0.71 (CI: 0.566–0.856) in women, respectively. The cutoffs of C index were 1.30 in elderly, in both sexes, with sensitivity $92%, the LAP ranged from 26.4 to 37.4 in men and from 40.6 to 44.0 in women and the VAI was 1.24 to 1.45 (sens$76.9%) in men and 1.46 to 1.84 in women. Conclusion: Both the anthropometric indicators, C Index and WHtR, as well as LAP and VAI had high accuracy in visceral obesity discrimination. So, they are effective in cardiovascular risk assessment and in the follow-up for individual and collective clinical practice.pt_BR
dc.description.localSan Franciscopt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103499-
Aparece nas coleções:DNUTL - Artigos de periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
AnthropometricClinicalIndicatorsVisceralFat.pdf948,09 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.