1. Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de Sergipe - RI/UFS
  2. PRODUÇÃO CIENTÍFICA
  3. DOD - Departamento de Odontologia (São Cristóvão)
  4. DOD - Artigos de periódicos
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/25148
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorTakeshita, Wilton Mitsunari-
dc.contributor.authorChicarelli, Mariliani-
dc.contributor.authorIwaki, Lilian Cristina Vessoni-
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-06T18:42:51Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-06T18:42:51Z-
dc.date.issued2015-12-
dc.identifier.citationTAKESHITA, W.; CHICARELLI, M.; IWAKI, L. C. V. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of root perforation, external resorption and fractures using cone‑beam computed tomography, panoramic radiography and conventional & digital periapical radiography. Indian Journal of Dental Research, Mumbai, v. 26, n. 6, p. 619–626, nov./dez. 2015. Disponível em: https://journals.lww.com/ijdr/fulltext/2015/26060/comparison_of_diagnostic_accuracy_of_root.14.aspx. Acesso em: 15 maio 2026.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1998-3603-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/25148-
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherMedknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.pt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofIndian Journal of Dental Researchpt_BR
dc.subjectCone-beam computed tomographyeng
dc.subjectDiagnosiseng
dc.subjectDigital radiographyeng
dc.subjectOrthopantomographyeng
dc.subjectRoot resorptioneng
dc.subjectTooth fractureseng
dc.titleComparison of diagnostic accuracy of root perforation, external resorption and fractures using cone‑beam computed tomography, panoramic radiography and conventional & digital periapical radiographypt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.identifier.licenseCreative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)pt_BR
dc.description.resumoContext: Some radicular changes are challenging for clinicians to diagnose, such as of root perforations, external root resorption (ERR), and vertical root fractures (VRFs). This study aims to facilitate it by comparing the diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), orthopantomography, and conventional and digital periapical radiography (DPR) in the diagnosis of such problems. Is it worth doing CBCT despite the radiation dose? Aims: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT, panoramic radiography, and conventional and DPR in the diagnosis of root perforation (RP), ERR, and VRF. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 40 extracted human teeth and 10 macerated human mandibles. RPs were performed using diamond burs, ERRs using spherical carbide burs, and RFs using a universal machine EMIC-DL 1000. The images were evaluated by 6 dentomaxillofacial radiologists. Results: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) revealed that CBCT showed the highest area under the ROC curve (Az) values for RP, ERR, and VRF (0.903, 0.950, and 0.849, respectively). The worst Az values for RP, ERR, and VRF (0.718, 0.494, and 0.611, respectively) were for panoramic radiography. Conclusions: CBCT showed the best results in the diagnosis of ERR and VRF. The diagnosis of ERR was the least accurate, panoramic radiography being not appropriate for its diagnosis. CBCT and conventional periapical radiography obtained similar results for the evaluation of RP. So for, RP indicate the conventional periapical radiography because CBCT has a higher radiation dose.pt_BR
dc.description.localMumbaipt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.176927-
Aparece nas coleções:DOD - Artigos de periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ComparisonDiagnosticAccuracyRootPerforation.pdf1,51 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.