A marca da lei no corpo : considerações sobre o registro da (in)utilidade no corpo de trabalhadores bancários

Abstract

This study aims to describe what discourses about the illness of the body of the worker diagnosed with RSI/Dort and its relation to social protection devices of the state (accident benefits and wages) and against the state (administrative and legal demands of the workers against the INSS). This is intended to identify the reports about the (in) utility body worker diagnosed with RSI/Dort present in INSS and publications from these publications, map the other social actors that present themselves in these documents in discourses on the concept of body unable to work. Also problematize the relationship between work, body and health in contemporary from the senses that are constructed in discursive play and how the various devices and instances of state crossing in the production of meanings about the subjects that are affected by RSI/WMSD and we are in a situation of inability to work. In an attempt to demarcate the conditions of possibility of these discourses, seeks to emphasize the historicity of brands involved in aspects of production, circulation and consumption of these discourses. Based on the desk research as a methodological strategy, the work is guided in look that takes the analysis of the discursive practices through the production of meanings. Documents are used as the publications of the INSS on your Website that have addressed the issue as RSI/Dort. Examination of documents, notes the consolidation of the publications of the INSS in the production of meanings about RSI/Dort, but also is the recent statement arregimento between the Ministry of Social Security and the Ministry of Health and Ministry of Labour and Employment. Regarding the assessment of incapacity for work, emphasizes the supremacy of medical care for physical examinations, which possibly indicates the importance given to social security expert in the production of truth about this disease. Therapeutic measures are still considered incipient and the prognosis is not favorable to the worker. The reintegration of the worker who has been affected by RSI/Dort and is able to return to work is still a step-confrontational, which has demanded accountability questions about the disease and the social protection of such workers. Shares judicias between worker and company, employee and company and INSS and seem to establish a field conflictive to guarantee rights and social protection for the worker who is marked as unable to work due to RSI/Dort.